Slow Bob wrote:
>>> Here are some simple signs reputable scientists point to.
>>>
>>> Glacier national park doesn't have them any more.
>>>
>>> The Permafrost in Alaska is melting causing havoc.
>>>
>>> The North Pole, for the first time in recorded history has areas of
>>> water during the summer.
>>
>> And in pre-recorded history it was ****ing frozen solid year-round.
>> Ever hear about the Ice Age or did you miss class at Columbia that
>> day, moron?

HELLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOO?

>>> The consequence of global warming are disastrous.
>>
>> The consequences of your stupidity are far more disastrous and immediate.
>
> Even if I were stupid,

You are. You really are.

> which no vegan in the group I'm sure would agree with,

Appealing to popularity. And among a group of self-marginals at that!

> just you trolls.

Not trolls. I'm discussing the issues you raise and correcting you.

> And if I were stupid,

Established. You really, really are. You, Bob, are ridiculously stupid.

> and the many scientists
> that agree that global warming is real,

Appealing to both authority and popularity, after I've already shown you
polls showing that climatologists are split on the subject.

> we are talking about flooding of
> coastal cities,

Why the hell did you move to Tampa then?

> famine, perhaps a change of current to Europe actually
> making it colder,

Good. Maybe that will keep Europeans from smelling so bad in the summer.

> homes collapsing in Alaska, more violent storms.

You left out alien abductions and increases in bigfoot sightings.

> Many reputable scientists

Ipse dixit. Reputable scientists don't make outlandish claims about the
future. Activists do.

> say this is the future, and man made
> greenhouse gasses are the greatest cause of this.

What have you done to reduce your own greenhouse gases, Slow Bob?

>>> Statements about hybrid cars are generally bull.
>>
>> No, hybrids are more fuel-efficient and less polluting than standard
>> gasoline vehicles.
>
> The difference in fuel mileage is only a few miles per gallon. Check
> the stats. Prove me wrong.

I did, Slow Bob, and I used an example which shows >43% increased fuel
efficiency and a significant reduction in emissions (e.g., greenhouse
gases). You make Forrest Gump look like Albert Einstein.

>>> While the Insight and Prios are high mileage cars, the rest simply
>>> reduce the engine a little and use the hybrid to produce higher
>>> performance.
>>
>> You don't understand how they work. Not surprising since you think
>> cattle reproduce at the same rate as rats.
>>
>>> They don't get significantly more gas mileage.
>>
>> Ford Escape Hybrid versys 4cyl-Auto
>>
>> MPG (city)
>> Hybrid: 36 Normal: 22
>> MPG (hwy)
>> Hybrid: 31 Normal: 25
>> MPG (combined)
>> Hybrid: 33 Normal: 23
>> Annual Fuel Cost*
>> Hybrid: $1041 Normal: $1494
>>
>> The hybrid is >43% more fuel-efficient. I'd say that's very significant.
>>
>> You can compare other vehicles yourself, dummy:
>> http://www.fueleconomy.gov/
>>
>>> Just a few facts.
>>
>> Not facts, you're blowing hot air out of your ass as usual.

Established.