Space Cowboy > wrote:
>Then don't claim I need to supply scientific evidence for my IMHO
>anecdotal tea tasting experiences. All the science presented so far is
>meaningless factoids. You can't win at lotto unless you buy a ticket.

No, not at all. The science presented has been admittedly only qualitative,
but getting quantitative measurements of, say, three elements in tea like
tannic acid, caffeine, and total aromatic content should be easy enough to
do, and will show exactly the same results that the qualitative evaluation
will. I question your understanding of the scientific process.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."