Michael Balarama wrote:

> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>Michael Balarama wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
thlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Evidence suggests remedies offer placebo effect, but
>>>>no real benefits"
>>>>
>>>>Reuters
>>>>
>>>>LONDON - The world may be beating a path to the doors
>>>>of homeopathic practitioners as an alternative to
>>>>conventional medicines, but according to a new study
>>>>they may just as well be taking nothing.
>>>>
>>>>The study, published in Friday's edition of the
>>>>respected Lancet medical journal, is likely to anger
>>>>the growing numbers of devoted practitioners of and
>>>>adherents to alternative therapies that include homeopathy.
>>>>
>>>>more at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9078909/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Just like "reflexology", better known as foot massage.
>>>> These therapies are quackery. They have appeal for
>>>>uneducated, credulous dummies.
>>>
>>>
>>>This study is not true
>>
>>You're a moron, Mikie. The study is *legitimate*
>>(studies aren't "true", you dope), and its conclusion
>>is probably correct.
>>
>>You can't question its methodology, Mikie, because you
>>don't know a thing about science. You like
>>"homeopathy" for some non-scientific reason, and now
>>you feel that your non-scientific beliefs are being
>>attacked by the study's conclusion.
>
>
> Whatever whatever

No, you stpuid uneducated ****. A valid scientific
study didn't find "whatever"; it found that
"homeopathic" medicine works no better than placebos.
And you are INCOMPETENT to dispute their finding. You
just don't *like* their finding because you enjoy
wallowing in pseudo-scientific ignorance, but you can't
rationally dispute it.


> -Homeopathic medicine worked-

You would have had the same results taking sugar cubes
that some lied to you about and said they contained
"medicine".