On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:31:39 -0400, "Matthew L. Martin"
> wrote:

>Dan Krueger wrote:
>> We're old friends. He, like most of us, aren't self-proclaimed
>> trollers. We also don't post to alt.cult.kibology.
>
>Ummmm.... Should I post links to your posts to ARK or are you willing to
>retract?
>
Dank thinks no one pay attention, and that if he just repeats a lie
often enough people will believe it. For instance, consider how many
times he has denied that he tried to get me fired by complaining to my
boss about posts to Usenet. Yet somehow my boss is able to pull the
name "Dan Krueger" out of thin air. Why is that?

Dank first said there were no complaints sent to my boss. Then he said
that he didn't send them. Then he said that the complaints were
forgeries, as if someone would go to the trouble of impersonating him
while complaining to my boss. (Occam's Razor, anyone?)

All the while, one common thread runs through all his bleating: He
isn't man enough to own up to what he did.