On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 23:25:36 GMT, Dan Krueger
> wrote:

>Interesting. "Real life" and "Usenet posts".

Moron. "Real life" and "meat space" have been used for years to refer
to offline as opposed online activities.

>When you type on your
>computer do you fall into some fantasy land? Are you ashamed of what
>you post?

If I were, do you suppose I'd post under my real name, Dank?

>If I had a boss, he/she wouldn't have an issue with what I
>post so why is it such a problem for you?

English, Dank. Why is what such a problem? The fact that you're a
coweard who won't admit that you e-mailed my boss is the only problem
I see -- and it's yours.

>I never sent a complaint to your boss.

You're a liar. You KNOW that you will be met with contempt if you
admit what you did, because on Usenet there are few things more
pathetic and reprehensible than what you did. So you hide, and deny.

Do you think anyone believes you? There isn't a soul in ARK except CAL
who thinks for a moment that you're telling the truth.

My. Boss. Knows. Your. Name.
I didn't tell him your name. He got it from the e-mails you sent to
him.

You can wave your hands all you want, stammering about conspiracy
theories and forgeries. Other people see right through your denials.

>If your "shared laugh" is the
>result of a complaint then why are you dwelling on it. Sounds like more
>of your signature trolling BS to me.

Dwelling on it? I only want folks to see you for what you a a sad,
pathetic, vindictive, impotent little man who tried to get me fired
because you got your little feelings hurt on Usenet. Why don't you
just admit it, little man?

>Take it back to alt.cult.kibology

Tell me, Dank. What are you doing these days in ARK? Why do you read
and post in a group you have such little regard for? Do you ever post
anything there but personal attacks against me, and thinly veiled
threats about contacting my employer?

That's k00k-sign, Dank. True k00k-sign.

>and spare the people here your sad story.

I've ignored you for months, Dank, and it drives you batshit. Your
reduced to following me from group to group, talking to yourself
because everyone else has you killfiled. You've been mocked, taunted,
and reviled up and down ARK, and now you've followed me back here to
hump my leg. Thanks for the opportunity to tell people here that
you're a sad, impotent little man willing to take a Usenet dispute
into meatspace.

>I would have emailed you privately but you seem to think that is
>"stalking".

You've been told before to stay the **** out of my mailbox.

When you mailed my boss to try to get me fired, you must've thought
you were justified in doing so. So why don't you admit it now? Are you
ashamed of your actions, little man?

>Get some meds.

You better copyright that highly original attempt at flaming.

>Dank

IFYSFY

Now grow a pair and admit what you did.

>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 17:33:20 GMT, Dan Krueger
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"We're old friends" = a joke. I don't know your boss, I don't even know
>>>his name.
>>>
>>>Post a copy of my correspondence with your boss. You can't seem to do that.
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I had no need at the time to ask for a copy, since all
>> that resulted from your complaints was a shared laugh between us at
>> the petty vindictiveness of someone going Real Life over some Usenet
>> posts. I figured it was you, or CAL, but it was only when my boss
>> referred to you by name that I had my suspicions confirmed.
>>
>> The other reason I didn't ask for a copy of your e-mails to my boss? I
>> mean, besides the impotence of your attempt? I don't drag people from
>> meat space into Usenet disputes, particularly when they aren't
>> involved. You do -- or at least you tried to. I'm not about to post
>> e-mail to my boss, only to have you stammer and stutter about
>> "forgeries."
>>
>> Be a man. Grow a pair and admit that you wrote to my boss in an
>> attempt to get me in trouble over posts to Usenet.
>>