> ravinwulf writes:

"Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>
>>ravinwulf wrote:
>>
>>>>So? That doesn't mean he *definitely* did it *this* time.
>>>
>>> He's on videotape kidnapping her.
>>
>>That's evidence of a kidnapping, not a murder.
>>
>>> How much more proof do you need?
>>
>>Evidence, not proof. And, that video is not evidence of him *murdering* her,
>>just of him taking her away by the arm. You're assuming more *based* on the
>>video, but your assumption is not supported by the video. For all you know,
>>he kidnapped her but someone *else* killed her. You *can't* claim the video
>>is evidence for anything more than what the video shows.
>
>Give me a break. You sound like a lawyer for the defense trying to
>weasel a guilty man out of a conviction. What are the odds that this
>kid met up with not one, but two nutcases in one day? Anyone with a
>lick of common sense knows he did it.

Sure'nuff sounds like lynch-mob mentality... yoose woulda been right to home on
some southern plantation.


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."