On 6 Sep 2005 22:01:30 -0700, "Nico" > wrote:

>>In what way is RFDT inaccessible?
>
>>/Lew
>
>What might (maybe), be lacking is an index of tea with info and
>reviews, which curious people can access. In other words, a wikipedia
>especially for tea.

Reminds me of the now stale "We Review Teas" site
(http://www.normbrero.com/cgi-bin/viewTea.cgi) which was a very good
effort that did exactly what you are speaking of. However, this is the
danger of such a site, it takes someone to commit to maintaining it
perpetually or it quickly becomes stale. There was talk of reviving
the above site in a sort of "open source" community model, but I am
not sure what the final decision ever was.

Mike Petro
http://www.pu-erh.net
"In this work, when it shall be found that much is omitted, let it not be forgotten that much likewise is performed."
Samuel Johnson, 1775, upon finishing his dictionary.