On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:19:50 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>Derek wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:52:26 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:38:14 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>Derek wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:09:01 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At present, "grass-fed beef" means exactly that: 100%
>>>>>>>grass-fed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, that isn't true,
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, it is true. The USDA has proposed, but NOT YET
>>>>>ADOPTED
>>>>
>>>> Not so.
>>>>
>>>> "The proposed marketing claim standards may be used in
>>>> conjunction with [non]existing regulations or voluntary
>>>> USDA grade standards in USDA Certified and USDA
>>>> Verified programs." [my edit]
>>>>
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>"AMS is seeking public comment on the following proposed United
>>>> States Standards for Livestock and Meat Marketing Claims. New
>>>> participants in USDA Certified or USDA Verified programs will be
>>>> required to adhere to the United States Standards for Livestock and
>>>> Meat Marketing Claims immediately."
>>>
>>>So. PROPOSED, not adopted.
>>
>> Adopted immediately
>
>NOT adopted.
>
>http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/stand/claim.htm
>http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/ls-st.htm
>http://www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/
>
>It is STILL only a proposed standard.

What part in, "New participants in USDA Certified or
USDA Verified programs will be required to adhere to
the United States Standards for Livestock and Meat
Marketing Claims immediately." don't you understand?

>You are a liar.

The evidence proves I've not lied while your desperate
snipping of it proves you want to conceal the truth, so
which out of the two of us is lying here? Think about it.