On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:59:38 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:22:31 +0100, Derek > wrote:
>>On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:09:01 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>
>>>At present, "grass-fed beef" means exactly that: 100%
>>>grass-fed.
>>
>>No, that isn't true, and it's because of that intentional
>>lying to the consumer that U.S.D.A. have "proposed
>>minimum requirements for livestock and meat industry
>>production/marketing claims, when adopted, will
>>become the United States Standards for Livestock
>>and Meat Marketing Claims."
>
> Regardless

Nope. The grass fed beef you refer to is the same
grass fed beef as defined by U.S.D.A. You don't
get to define it differently, Harrison. Grass fed beef
animals are fed grains in feedlots like any other
steer, and accrue the same numbers of collateral
deaths.