I just brought the new guy up to speed so your accusation of
intolerance is in context. I first used the term Rosetta stone here
while you were an active poster. You change that story every time.
First it was public domain not copyright, then you couldn't have known
, and last serendipity. You're worse than Sasha fishing in other
groups for what people said but I stand by that statement because the
Supreme Court said I could do it for personal use and not because some
vendor tried to keep honest people honest. You say public service I
say infomercial with commercial links otherwise why not more links that
sells puerh? If you impose the criteria you're selling something. The
Charter taken as a whole prohibits commercial posting. We have a
hypocrite that accused TeaTalk of using the newsgroup for commercial
gain. This is a discussion group and if you can't say it here then
you're a special interest looking for traffic. 99% of what you say is
regurgitation so load up your site with hypertext anchors and provide
those for people who pay for bandwidth on newsgroup servers. Remember
this is Usenet and not WWW. I wouldn't want anybody chosen last for a
dodgeball team sticking up for me. The people most concered about God
are the sinners. If I don't care where you buy tea, then you don't
care where I do. All I can say if you recommend a site it is off my
list. I even changed puer sellers on Ebay. Now you can take a guess
and blabbermouth who you think that is. You're batting 50/50.

Jim

Mike Petro wrote:
> Space Cowboy wrote:
> > You're the guy who steals my ideas from this group and uses it on your
> > website under the guise of public domain.
>
> Jim, that old song is getting lame.
....