On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:09:39 GMT, "Darryl L. Pierce,,,"
> wrote:


>By "interpret" you mean assume what's not visible in the video, right? The
>video shows a man (his face is not that clear, not clear enough to be Smith
>otherwise there wouldn't be so much question initially) *abducting* the
>girl. That's not evidence of him *murdering* her. He may very will have
>handed her to someone else and *they* murdered here. You're assuming what's
>not evident.

I agree with you on the need for a trial, but you assertion that he
may be guilty of the abduction but not the murder is wrong.
If he abducted the girl, and she is killed, he is guilty of murder,
even if he didn't do the murder himself.
Pan Ohco