Nick Andrew wrote:
> (Victor Sack) writes:
>
> >I notice that there has been no reaction to my request to provide an
> >estimate of expected traffic for the proposed newsgroup and the current
> >traffic on the net related to this topic, i.e. food from an Australian
> >perspective. This is a standard, even elementary, request and the
> >reasons for it are well explained in the aus.* FAQ. Yet no estimate has
> >been forthcoming. Is this no longer of any importance in the aus.*
> >hierarchy? If so, shouldn't the pertinent parts be deleted from the FAQ
> >as no longer relevant?
>
> No, you're just too late. We've moved on from the RFD already, and are
> in the voting phase now. The proposal now stands or falls on its own
> merit, inadequate or not.
>
> Nick.
> --
> http://www.nick-andrew.net/ http://aus.news-admin.org/
> I prefer USENET replies. Don't send email copies. Drop the spamtrap to reply.

This would appear to support Victor's and the Ranger's points and
suggest to non-Ozzian RFC members that if they wish to keep reading
postings related to OZ in the same forum as they read postings related
to most other cookings rather than in some inadequately described and
discussed forum it is in their interest to vote AGAINST the creation of
this group.

-bwg