Nick Andrew > wrote:
> (Victor Sack) writes:
>
> >I notice that there has been no reaction to my request to provide an
> >estimate of expected traffic for the proposed newsgroup and the current
> >traffic on the net related to this topic, i.e. food from an Australian
> >perspective. This is a standard, even elementary, request and the
> >reasons for it are well explained in the aus.* FAQ. Yet no estimate has
> >been forthcoming. Is this no longer of any importance in the aus.*
> >hierarchy? If so, shouldn't the pertinent parts be deleted from the FAQ
> >as no longer relevant?
>
> No, you're just too late. We've moved on from the RFD already, and are
> in the voting phase now.
Eh, I posted what was effectively the very same thing, more than once
even, even quoting parts of the aus.* FAQ, *during the RFD discussion* -
and nothing happened.
> The proposal now stands or falls on its own
> merit, inadequate or not.
That is obvious enough about *now*. What about *before*?
Victor