On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:49:33 -0700, sf > wrote:

>Modern ediquitte is to top post, but of course, there are
>luddites/dinosaurs like you who are stuck in the bulletin board/list
>serve age who want to still drive around in a horse and buggy. Get
>with the times! In my experience, the worst offenders are those who
>bottom post.... WHY you ask? It's because it makes me wade through
>way too many lines to find a reply I wish I hadn't wasted my time on -
>that's why.
>
>If the only reason for bottom posting is "to follow" the conversation,
>then top posting is the way to go. That way those of us who don't
>need to read the last 10 million unedited posts are spared and those
>who want to read EVERYTHING can read from the bottom up.

Hello,

Can you show me one example of an "Inter-post" (that is, one
in which the person responding places their comments at a
few points within the post to which they are responding)
that is top posted within the original post?

I can't find such an example.

That's because people cannot understand a threaded
communication when they read the response before the
question.

All the best,
--
Kenneth

If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."