Victor Sack wrote:
> > wrote:
>
> > Wrong thread for that sort of discussion. It's a call for votes, not a
> > call for whingers to moan and groan about being ignored becuase their
> > objections aren't being agreed with. Nothing flew over my head other
> > than your need to go on and on and on about something that is obviuosly
> > outside your bounds of control. Do you like to be controlling and hate
> > it when things don't go your way?
>
> I'm arguing my case in the only thread that is relevant to it. Are you
> trying to be controlling of what and where people post? What a
> hypocrite!
>
> > > It is unethical to vote "YES" for a group one couldn't care less about.
> > > What an unprincipled decision!
> >
> > What's more unethical than hijacking a thread about a new aus food
> > group to rant and rave about your feelings on the whole aus hierarchy?
>
> Hijacking a thread, indeed! Any thread about any new group in an
> administrative newsgroup is almost by definition about the whole
> hierarchy too, when there are issues that obviously touch the whole.
> Duh!
>
> > You're allowed your opinion and yes, you've made it perfectly clear
> > many, many times. Have you thought about the negative impact that it
> > could have on other posters attitude toward the subject? Feh, talk
> > about principles.
>
> Why, yes, one posts one's opinion to have a negative or positive or
> neutral impact, as the case may be. Else why post at all? Have I had
> such a negative impact on you? Has your attitude toward the subject
> suffered a lot? Oh, the poor, poor attitude! And such a touchy concern
> for those hapless sheep (other posters) who cannot even form their own
> opinion! You wouldn't know principles if they hit your on the head.

And there lies the rub. other posters are just hapless sheep? You're
opnion of yourself is vastly over inflated. I wouldn't know principles
if they hit me on the head? What are you blithering on about man?

FYI I was pointing out that by posting over and over and over again
with the same whiney attitude that you would have a negative impact on
those who were understanding of your cause. Now by posting such inane
diatribe you've cemented those 'hapless sheep's thoughts (even though
they can't 'form their own opinion') into voting for this NG. I've seen
a couple of posts mentioning this because of your 'attitude'. Which, by
the way, sucks. Big Time.

Have a nice day :-D

Doc