On 20 Dec 2005 23:09:26 -0800, "-L." > wrote:

>
>GQ wrote:
>> On 19 Dec 2005 23:10:33 -0800, "-L." > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >GQ wrote:
>> >> Oh my. I do think we could have disagreed a bit more nicely. LOL
>> >
>> >LOL...Oh, just wait. Ranee will run back to Rich and ask him how to
>> >respond, LOL...
>> >-L.
>>
>> LOLOLOLOL She has been quite the testy one replying to my posts.
>> Apparently she thinks that if anyone questions anything or says
>> anything different from her view that it means that we are after her
>> religion. She doesn't even know the true history of her own religion
>> but she replies testy the way she does. LOLOLOL
>>
>> GQ
>
>She has a long history of hypocrisy. She's the number one banner-waver
>for "Christians are persecuted" on Usenet.
>
>-L.

A bigot is a bigot. Every religions spawns a few. In fact, some even
exist among those who claim no religion.

It is overbearing to be preached at by someone who cloaks herself in
religiosity, only to find out she doesn't know Scripture from Shinola
about her own.

Boron