On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, rox formerly rmg wrote:

>
> "djs0302" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>
> > I think most of these animal activists are grossly misinformed and
> > uneducated. If the hen hasn't mated with a rooster why should it
> > matter if there are "unborn" eggs left inside it? The same thing can
> > be said about normal eggs. Without a rooster there can be no chicken
> > embryo. The yolk and white are food for the chicken embryo. The
> > embryo develops on the yolk but the yolk itself does not develop into a
> > baby chicken.
>
> It just makes you wonder what gives people the idea to eat certain things.
>
> - chicken eggs
> - oysters
> - fish roe
>
> etc. Mmm. chicken eggs, oysters, and fish roe!
>

Oh, my!