Bob (this one) wrote:
> Last evening, Chung's little get-together was a bust.

No. I enjoyed it.

> Total of three
> names on the board with one flashing in and out - didn't keep the
> connection alive.

Folks are not required to stay long. It is a chat room after all.

> Poor guy gave a party and nobody came.

It was not a party. You are hardly a nobody, dear Bob :-)

> Shocked, I tell you.

It seems you always expect a put-down.

> And when so many people take him "seriously" it's hard to imagine that
> *nobody* much came by to share his "wisdom" and "education."

Lurkers remain more than welcome :-)

> And he seems like such an earnest young "man." So "sincere" in his
> efforts to "inform" everyone about his "discernments."

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

> A good topic for his "glowfests" would be where to buy those cool big
> red noses and floppy shoes. And maybe plate tectonics and nuclear
> weaponry and realpolitik and biblical interpretation and ...

Instead of coveting these chats, you are more than welcome to organize
your own.

Please know that you remain in my prayers, dear Bob whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name :-))

Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, cooking and nutrition that interest those
following this thread here during the next on-line chat (02/02/06) from
6 to 7 pm EST:

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

Prayerfully in Christ's love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/8juld