On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:06:52 -0600, Michel Boucher
> wrote:
>zxcvbob > wrote in
:
>
>>> And that is conclusive...a blog...
>>
>> You'll have to decide for yourself if it's conclusive. Don't
>> dismiss it just because it is a blog. (Even FoxNews is right
>> sometimes)
>
>And this is substantiation for the allegation that Mullahs broke one of
>the basic laws of Islam?
Do you want me to send you to any of several world-renown museums or
link to you dozens of cites that show Islamic art works with The
Prophet in them? Just how snowed are you anyway?
>I have yet to find a plausible explanation for such behaviour on the
>part of the mullahs, which is in direct breach of the laws of Islam.
>It seems much more likely that these are *purported to have been*, and
>any proof would most likely be suspect, but obviously not so much for
>you. Danes, generally, do not like Muslims (and they may have some
>reason as Muslims are loath to assimilate) which as I understand it
>predates these events by a few decades. It wouldn't be surprising that
>such a thing would have been put together to capitalize on this
>inherent dislike.
Yeah, well, BS. Someone has collected a few art works at the link
below, and frankly, they come much closer to idolatry, to which the
prohibition truly applies, than the Danish cartoons.
Face it....the application of Islamic law has, in this case, been
arbitrary, the focus not of religious indignation and abomination, and
the ruckus raised not in direct objection to the cartoons, but because
the encouraged rioting is bread and circuses to a often
poverty-stricken and downtrodden bunch of people in places such as
Iran, Syria, Indonesia, Gaza, Afghanistan, etc....If you keep them
rioting in the streets, they will be too busy to riot and overthrow
the government. If you keep them hating the Jews, they will not kill
each other as often. If you keep them hating the West, you can get
away with stealing foreign aid and not using it to bolster the
economy.
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/
Boron