Bob Myers wrote:

>
> > burger they eat is just as uninspired as the others they ate there. Lots
> of
> > people seem to like that and good for them if they can profit from the
> bad
> > taste of the public. I am just glad that there are other places who at
> least
> > aspire to something bettor.
>
> No argument there (well, possibly with your spelling of
> "better" :-)),

LOL I made a typo that my spell checker caught and hit Replace a split second
before realizing it was recommending bettor instead of better. If I had made
as many mistakes as I usually do the spell checker would have been busier and
I would have had time to go back :-)


> but again I can't really fault a business - and
> this IS a business we're talking about, not some charitable
> or religious organization with a fanatical devotion to bringing
> hamburger nirvana to the unbelievers -

Oh I am aware of it being a business and being interested in making a buck. I
am just old fashioned enough that I prefer restaurants that are proud of their
food because it is so good rather than their claim to fame being that every
burger is the same.

>
> comes under either of those headings. If Ronald McDonald
> were standing outside the places, and forcing people in off the
> streets to consumer the fare at gunpoint, that would be a
> different story. But everyone who's eating in a McDonald's
> is doing so because they have chosen to do so, and I've got no
> right at all to gripe about THEIR choices, so long as they
> don't affect me.

The way it affects you and me is that other places go belly up when the masses
go to the golden arches instead of to them.