"H.E. Eickleberry, Jr." wrote:
>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. wrote:
> >> "Dazed and confused" > wrote in message
> >> oups.com...
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> > Ike has admitted on several occasions to being unwelcome in his own
> >> > denomination. Ironic for one that calls everyone a cultist.
> >>
> >> Ike has never said any such thing, Satan.
> >>
> >
> > It is written that when LORD Jesus was accused of being Satan because
> > of HIS power to drive out demons, HE responded as follows:
> >
> > "Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or
> > household divided against itself will not stand. If Satan drives out
> > Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand?
> > And if I drive out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your people drive
> > them out? So then, they will be your judges. But if I drive out
> > demons by the Spirit of GOD, then the kingdom of GOD has come upon
> > you." (Matthew 12:25-28)
> >
> > May you choose to be part of HIS kingdom where HIS subjects know HIS
> > voice and follow HIS commandments:
> >
> > (1) Love GOD with all your hearts, souls, minds, and strengths.
> >
> > (2) Love each other as you would yourselves
> >
> > It is impossible to love GOD and then love someone whom you have judged
> > to be evil compelling you to call him/her Satan.
>
> Rationalistic nonsense.

The truth.

> 1) Jesus loved Peter.

Jesus is GOD. What is impossible for us is possible for HIM.

> 2) When Peter misspoke himself, supplanting Jesus' message with his own
> message, Jesus rebuked him, calling Peter "Satan."

Actually, Jesus called out "Get behind me, Satan!" addressing Satan and
not Peter.

> So, if your ****-poor attempt at denunciation were anywhere near true (which
> it is not), then Jesus calling Peter Satan would have been a violation of
> His own commandments, and created a ethical paradox in Jesus' own teachings.

Even if it were true that Jesus called Peter Satan, HE would have still
been able to do the impossible of loving Peter despite judging that
Peter were evil.

> > Matthew 7 is helpful here.
> >
> > In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Ike whom I love, in
> > Jesus' most precious and holy name.
>
> Save it for yourself, you who changes and diminishes the message of Jesus
> Christ.

It seems to be your choice to judge others. It remains my choice to
refrain per my LORD's helpful suggestions from Matthew 7.

For this you will remain in my prayers, dear Ike whom I love, in Jesus'
most precious and holy name.

Will be available to "glow" and chat about this and other things like
cardiology, diabetes, Bird Flu, the 2006 global earthquake advisory,
cooking and nutrition that interest those following this thread here
during the next on-line chat (03/09/06) from 6 to 7 pm EST:

http://tinyurl.com/8w7uq

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/7mcuo

Prayerfully in Christ's love,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/rgsp8