View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
Dominic T. Dominic T. is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default Let's get divalent


Alex Chaihorsky wrote:
> First of all it was not I who discovered this (and I use the word discovery
> without hesitation), but DogMa.
> Second - tomato example has nothing to do witth this - see above.
> Third - I would not even touch homeopathy as an argument here precisely
> because its mechanism were never understood or even expalined - that is why
> allopaths (the "normal" doctors) still make an argument that homeopathy is
> cookery and until today it is not accepted by AMA as "scientific" medicine
> and that is why your insurance company never pays for homeopathic
> treatments.


I would like you to please tell me how the salts among other minerals,
added AFTER the fact are not simply enhancing the flavors present just
as in my example. You want to discredit my criticism of this theory,
but you have not directly refuted it. And if you reject that as a fair
appraisal of the argument, then the only option left to "explain"
DogMa's theory is exactly the same as the theories behind homeopathy.
Better yet, since it is not your "discovery," I would love to have
Dogma attempt to clear this up.

> I happen to work right now side-by-side with one of the greatest minds of
> our times - the guy who founded Cetus Corp and under whose supervision the
> PCR was invented for which Cetus scientists recei\ved 1992 Nobel prize. His
> name is Peter Farley and guess what he does after all that spectacular
> success? He leads a company that combines homeopathic approach with
> traditional Chinese medicine.
> And as opposed to your 2 cents this is multi-million dollar effort.


I knew that anyone who could back DogMa's original statements had to
have some connection or belief in homeopathy because that was what it
was all basically based around. I'm not bashing that belief, I don't
personally lend it any credence. I also do not want to cast stones, but
while Peter Farley may be smart... I would believe he is cashing in on
a big payday based on the "in" thing right now. There is a lot of money
to be made in homeopathy and selling proven ancient remedies for a
massive windfall. Especially when I can go to my local chinese herb
shop and have them make me a remedy for pennies that actually contains
the ingredients in a decent quantity that are believed to help the
situation, not less of them for many dollars. Smart, yes. Businessman,
yes. Greatest mind of our time, not in my eyes. I am not interested in
arguing or drawing this out much more than it already has been, I will
respectfully disagree with you and leave it at that. I saw through this
whole thing from the beginning, I am just speaking my mind and I am
more than willing to hear your side as objectively as possible.

- Dominic
Drinking: Brewing some loose leaf Pu-Erh as I type.