Rocks (was Let's get divalent)
snip
> I'm the last one who has the right to ask this, but...
> What quantitative data do you have to support
> your contention that homeopathy has been
> extremely effective? Reputable scientists, such
> perhaps as yourself are subject to bouts
> of subjectivity that require very careful
> analysis to tease out. That's why psychic
> phenomena studies often appear valid until
> proven otherwise.
>
> Michael
Know what? "Bouts of subjectivity" is quite wrong.
Substitute "unintentional errors." Thanks.
Michael
|