FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Mark Thorson

wrote:
>
> Mark Thorson wrote:
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Mark Thorson wrote:
> > > > Like what? Why don't you quote the best evidence
> > > > they have that Red 40 is carcinogenic?
> > >
> > > The evidence against Red 40 is pretty cut-and-dry.
> > > It convinced a lot of European governments.
> >
> > But you can't quote any of it?
> >
> > Is the best evidence against Red 40
> > the unsupported assertions of a
> > scaremongering website?
>
> You and the boron guy seem to be advocates of the additive-laden
> food industry. Here's a peer-reviewed article where the authors
> examined
> various studies of food dyes and their impact on behavior. This study
> is from Columbia University:

That has nothing to do with the untrue assertion
that Red 40 is carcinogenic.

May I now assume that the ONLY evidence
you have that Red 40 is carcinogenic
is the unsupported assertions of a
scaremongering website?

You have swallowed those assertions
hook, line, and sinker WITHOUT any
scientific evidence.

That makes you a fool. An ignorant,
hoodwinked fool.