>Doug Weller

>>sqwertz spurts:
>>>(PENMART01) wrote:
>>>
>>>London broil is not any specific cut, it's a method of cooking.
>>
>> Wrong again, as usual. London broils are labeled and sold as
>> specific cuts of meat. Definition from the USDA Policy Handbook:
>>
>> LONDON BROIL: Name can only be applied to a cooked product.
>> Products including the expression €œLondon Broil€� on labels must be
>> prepared with beef flank steak. Uncooked product must be labeled
>> to indicate this, e.g., €œBeef Flank Steak for London Broil.€� If
>> prepared from another cut, the identity of that cut must accompany
>> the term €œLondon Broil,€� e.g., €œSirloin Tip London Broil.€�
>
>What am I missing? That seems to be saying that the name London Broil can
>in some circumstances be used to label specific parts of the cow that have
>specific names, eg sirloin tip, flank steak, etc -- their own identities.
>It does not say that there is a part of a cow called London Broil.
>
>In other words, it seems to back up the argument that London Broil is a
>cooking method and not the name for a specific part of a cow.

Yes, sqwertz is a functionally illiterate *******.

---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."