JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
>
>
>>"JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote in
:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Well, that would be one way of dealing with it. I wonder, though, if
>>>some people would be incapable of understanding how much equipment
>>>cleanup would be needed, and end up creating more risk than if they'd
>>>just bought a box of frozen hamburger patties.
>>>
>>>
>>Who buys frozen hamburger patties, or fresh, without understanding the
>>bacteria risk of each if undercooked? Don't worry about other people being
>>incapable, they're not your concern. If you caa clean a frying pan, you
>>can
>>certainly clean a meat grinder (counter top or mixer attachment) just as
>>easily.
>>
>>That was the dumbest post I've read in ages.
>>
>>Andy
>>
>>
>
>You apparently have a very limited realm of experience with different types
>of people. Let's address your comments into pieces, to help you.
>
>1) Who doesn't understand the risk? People who seem to live in caves, and
>are pathetically unaware of what you and I have seen a million times in the
>news. Do you ever wonder how there could be anyone in this country who opens
>mysterious e-mail attachments?
>
>2) I can imagine almost any mechanical device. I should've been an inventor.
>But, try as I might, I can't imagine a meat grinder whose parts are as
>easily accessible as the two sides of a frying pan.
>
>
>
>
Try imagining two large knives. The classic way of mincing meat is to
put it on a board and whack it with two knives, like playing drums.

Christine