"Old Mother Ashby" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>
>>"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
>>
>>>"JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote in
:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well, that would be one way of dealing with it. I wonder, though, if
>>>>some people would be incapable of understanding how much equipment
>>>>cleanup would be needed, and end up creating more risk than if they'd
>>>>just bought a box of frozen hamburger patties.
>>>>
>>>Who buys frozen hamburger patties, or fresh, without understanding the
>>>bacteria risk of each if undercooked? Don't worry about other people
>>>being
>>>incapable, they're not your concern. If you caa clean a frying pan, you
>>>can
>>>certainly clean a meat grinder (counter top or mixer attachment) just as
>>>easily.
>>>
>>>That was the dumbest post I've read in ages.
>>>
>>>Andy
>>>
>>
>>You apparently have a very limited realm of experience with different
>>types of people. Let's address your comments into pieces, to help you.
>>
>>1) Who doesn't understand the risk? People who seem to live in caves, and
>>are pathetically unaware of what you and I have seen a million times in
>>the news. Do you ever wonder how there could be anyone in this country who
>>opens mysterious e-mail attachments?
>>
>>2) I can imagine almost any mechanical device. I should've been an
>>inventor. But, try as I might, I can't imagine a meat grinder whose parts
>>are as easily accessible as the two sides of a frying pan.
>>
>>
> Try imagining two large knives. The classic way of mincing meat is to put
> it on a board and whack it with two knives, like playing drums.
>
> Christine

That's nice, but Andy said "meat grinder", not two large knives.