In article >,
Dana Carpender > wrote:

> Krusty wrote:
>
> > "Dana Carpender" > wrote
> >
> >>Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> >>
> >>>Dana Carpender wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>And yeah, since grains and beans in any quantity have only been part of
> >>>>the human diet for 10,000 of the 2 million or more years we've been
> >>>>around, it's really hard to see how they're essential. Research
> >>>>indicates that the hunter/gatherer diet generally consisted of roughly
> >>>>50%-60% animal food, and the rest vegetables, wild (very low sugar)
> >>>>fruit in season, and nuts and seeds. Sounds about like my diet.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You know nothing about evolution, either.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>Nice assertion. Care to back it up?
> >
> >
> > Yeah you ****ing idiot. Human Beings haven't been around for 2 million
> > years.
> >
> > What else do you want to know.
>
> Cite?
>
> This suggests roots 3 million years back:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/231442.stm
>
> And we've been homo sapiens for an estimated 200,000 years. If you want
> to go by that, we were still hunter-gatherers for 80% of our existance.
>
> Or do you believe the world was created in 4004 BC? Because if you do,
> we can talk about who's the idiot.
>


So you are calling Krusty an idiot by agreeing that you made an
ignorant statement? Good job. I think that's a new one on UseNet.


--
Stefan: