In article > ,
Dana Carpender > wrote:
> Lord Hatred wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Dana Carpender > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Krusty wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Dana Carpender" > wrote
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Dana Carpender wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>And yeah, since grains and beans in any quantity have only been part of
> >>>>>>the human diet for 10,000 of the 2 million or more years we've been
> >>>>>>around, it's really hard to see how they're essential. Research
> >>>>>>indicates that the hunter/gatherer diet generally consisted of roughly
> >>>>>>50%-60% animal food, and the rest vegetables, wild (very low sugar)
> >>>>>>fruit in season, and nuts and seeds. Sounds about like my diet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You know nothing about evolution, either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Nice assertion. Care to back it up?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yeah you ****ing idiot. Human Beings haven't been around for 2 million
> >>>years.
> >>>
> >>>What else do you want to know.
> >>
> >>Cite?
> >>
> >>This suggests roots 3 million years back:
> >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/231442.stm
> >>
> >>And we've been homo sapiens for an estimated 200,000 years. If you want
> >>to go by that, we were still hunter-gatherers for 80% of our existance.
> >>
> >>Or do you believe the world was created in 4004 BC? Because if you do,
> >>we can talk about who's the idiot.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > So you are calling Krusty an idiot by agreeing that you made an
> > ignorant statement? Good job. I think that's a new one on UseNet.
>
>
> Nope. It's a question of what you want to call "human history." I was
> clarifying, and making the point that even if you want to go with the
> narrowest possible definition, we still, as a species, have an
> overwhelming history of eating a hunter-gatherer diet, which makes
> claims that grains and beans are essential for human health ridiculous.
>
So you're saying you approve of using evolution as it pertains to the
origin of homosapien but against the usage of the evolution of
homosapien as a creature itself as it pertains to dietary requirements?
You can't have it both ways.
--
Stefan: