Lord Hatred wrote:
> In article >,
> Dana Carpender > wrote:
>
> > Krusty wrote:
> >
> > > "Dana Carpender" > wrote
> > >
> > >>Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Dana Carpender wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>And yeah, since grains and beans in any quantity have only been part of
> > >>>>the human diet for 10,000 of the 2 million or more years we've been
> > >>>>around, it's really hard to see how they're essential. Research
> > >>>>indicates that the hunter/gatherer diet generally consisted of roughly
> > >>>>50%-60% animal food, and the rest vegetables, wild (very low sugar)
> > >>>>fruit in season, and nuts and seeds. Sounds about like my diet.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>You know nothing about evolution, either.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Nice assertion. Care to back it up?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah you ****ing idiot. Human Beings haven't been around for 2 million
> > > years.
> > >
> > > What else do you want to know.
> >
> > Cite?
> >
> > This suggests roots 3 million years back:
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/231442.stm
> >
> > And we've been homo sapiens for an estimated 200,000 years. If you want
> > to go by that, we were still hunter-gatherers for 80% of our existance.
> >
> > Or do you believe the world was created in 4004 BC? Because if you do,
> > we can talk about who's the idiot.
> >
>
>
> So you are calling Krusty an idiot by agreeing that you made an
> ignorant statement? Good job. I think that's a new one on UseNet.
>
>
> --
> Stefan:

No, she's right. (In the correct sense, not the poltical spectrum.) The
scientific community views Ergaster, Habilis, Neanderthalis and others
of the Homo genus as human, and counts them as human beings.