FoodBanter.com - View Single Post - Seriously...do people eat Pizza Hut in real life?

Dana Carpender

Lord Hatred wrote:

> In article .com>,
> wrote:
>
>
>>Lord Hatred wrote:
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> Dana Carpender > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Krusty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Dana Carpender" > wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Blair P. Houghton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dana Carpender wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>And yeah, since grains and beans in any quantity have only been part
>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>the human diet for 10,000 of the 2 million or more years we've been
>>>>>>>>around, it's really hard to see how they're essential. Research
>>>>>>>>indicates that the hunter/gatherer diet generally consisted of
>>>>>>>>roughly
>>>>>>>>50%-60% animal food, and the rest vegetables, wild (very low sugar)
>>>>>>>>fruit in season, and nuts and seeds. Sounds about like my diet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You know nothing about evolution, either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nice assertion. Care to back it up?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah you ****ing idiot. Human Beings haven't been around for 2 million
>>>>>years.
>>>>>
>>>>>What else do you want to know.
>>>>
>>>>Cite?
>>>>
>>>>This suggests roots 3 million years back:
>>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/231442.stm
>>>>
>>>>And we've been homo sapiens for an estimated 200,000 years. If you want
>>>>to go by that, we were still hunter-gatherers for 80% of our existance.
>>>>
>>>>Or do you believe the world was created in 4004 BC? Because if you do,
>>>>we can talk about who's the idiot.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So you are calling Krusty an idiot by agreeing that you made an
>>>ignorant statement? Good job. I think that's a new one on UseNet.
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Stefan:
>>
>>No, she's right. (In the correct sense, not the poltical spectrum.) The
>>scientific community views Ergaster, Habilis, Neanderthalis and others
>>of the Homo genus as human, and counts them as human beings.
>
>
>
>
> Some scientists will also argue that chimpanzees and gorillas should
> be included in the Homo class due to the genetic similarities. I
> wouldn't call them humans at all. As I stated before, you can't accept
> evolution of a species without evolution within the species.
>

I do. Now, compare 2-3 million years with 10,000 years.

Dana