"Krusty" > wrote:

>Simple carbohydrate
>intake would have been strikingly below that now common, and, somewhat
>counterintuitively, such diets would have provided only moderate levels of
>starch and other complex carbohydrates so that the total carbohydrate
>contribution to dietary energy would have been less, not more, than is
>typical in contemporary affluent nations.

This is supposed to be a cite AGAINST Dana? The person who says that
simple carbohydrates were strikingly lower and that complex carbs were
less than is typical in contemporary affluent nations?

OK, you've provided Dana's cite. Now how about one for your own
argument?
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27