mdginzo wrote:
> Dana Carpender wrote:
>
>>mdginzo wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Heh. Diabetics who get all anal about their >blood glucose levels are
>>>>stupid. Who needs *both* feet?
>>>
>>>
>>>Then non-diabetics ought to worry about their feet also since they get
>>>the same Bg levels carmen is freaking out about.
>>>
>>
>>Are you aware that glycolysis of proteins is the subject of some of the
>>hottest anti-aging research going? Non-diabetics pay for high BG
>>levels, too.
>>
>>Dana
>
>
> Then non-diabetics with normal Bg's need to worry about losing their
> limbs? Is there a lot of that going around with non diabetics? Can
> you produce statistics showing that non-diabetics with Bg's of 170 are
> losing their limbs? Jesus woman, are your book sales that important to
> you that you are willing to spread any lie to promote them?
>

You still really think that I'm going to get some sort of significant
book sales by arguing on usenet?

No. Diabetics sustain dramatically more glycation damage because of
sustained high blood sugar levels.

Dana