Dana Carpender wrote:
> mdginzo wrote:
> > Dana Carpender wrote:
> >
> >>mdginzo wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Heh. Diabetics who get all anal about their >blood glucose levels are
> >>>>stupid. Who needs *both* feet?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Then non-diabetics ought to worry about their feet also since they get
> >>>the same Bg levels carmen is freaking out about.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Are you aware that glycolysis of proteins is the subject of some of the
> >>hottest anti-aging research going? Non-diabetics pay for high BG
> >>levels, too.
> >>
> >>Dana
> >
> >
> > Then non-diabetics with normal Bg's need to worry about losing their
> > limbs? Is there a lot of that going around with non diabetics? Can
> > you produce statistics showing that non-diabetics with Bg's of 170 are
> > losing their limbs? Jesus woman, are your book sales that important to
> > you that you are willing to spread any lie to promote them?
> >
>
> You still really think that I'm going to get some sort of significant
> book sales by arguing on usenet?

Despite what many think, USENET is no longer some isolated part of the
INternet detached from all the rest. Yes, if you were to tell the
truth and admit that Atkins is a fad diet, you would lose many sales.
Lo-carb fads are your bread and butter. It is something you are going
to promote everywhere - if only tyo convince yourself of something that
is not true.