"Richard Periut" > wrote in message
...
> Curly Sue wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:55:38 GMT, Richard Periut >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Marcelino wrote:
> >>
> >>>You really need to check this out... Pork eater especially.
> >>>
> >>>http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs....nahan-pig-farm
> >>
> >
> >>A video which portrays a few sick and frustrated freaks, doesn't stand
> >>as the standard for killing pigs in the pork industry.
> >>
> >>It's just amazing the way these hypocrites try to raise awareness of
> >>animal suffering, without shedding an iota of evidence to human
> >>suffering; the children dying of hunger and *Curable* diseases in
> >>Africa, India, et cetera.
> >>
> >>I'm sure these people, with their cotton candy lives, driving their
> >>BMW's, and drinking California wine, would rather see a whale, a pig, a
> >>chicken, or a mink saved, before 10 human children can be fed and
healed.
> >
> >
> > What makes you say that?
>
>
> I never see those animal lovers, concern themselves with the biggest
> problem in our existence; human suffering--especially from situations in
> which there are remedies.
>
> >
> >
> >>What friggin quintessential hypocrisy!
> >
> >
> > Not everyone who is concerned about animal suffering drives BMWs,
> > drinks California wine (?), or has a cotton candy life, and it's
> > certainly not hypocritical to be dismayed by bad treatment of animals.
> >
>
> Yes when the human factor has been totally ignored. Can you look at
> yourself at the mirror in the mornings?


Pray tell what is it exactly you do to aid the suffering humans in the
world?

Paul