Dave Smith wrote:
> >
> > I think it's pretty much a Rube Goldberg contraption... I hope it
> > didn't cost too much.
>
> I guess that is your way of admitting that you were wrong about BBQ grills with an
> extra rotisserie burner across the back.

No, it's my way of informing you that your original post neglected to
accurately portray what you used. Had I not questioned you then you'd
probably never say... probably too embarrasseed to admit you spent good
money on that crapola... the instructions say to remove the grill
portion in order to rotisserie... what a dumb concept.

I still think that contraption is a stupid design.... is why I said I
hope it didn't cost too much. And still it needs no pan, otherwise
you've really wasted a lot of money, 'cause you coulda just roasted
your chicken in a pan in your kitchen oven with the same result.

Btw, there is nothing particularly Indian about that recipe... and
don't go blaming the fact that you found the recipe that way... would
you jump off the roof just because something you found said... maybe
you would, you were suckered in to buying that stupid contraption.

Sheldon