Sheldon wrote:

>
> > > I think it's pretty much a Rube Goldberg contraption... I hope it
> > > didn't cost too much.
> >
> > I guess that is your way of admitting that you were wrong about BBQ grills with an
> > extra rotisserie burner across the back.
>
> No, it's my way of informing you that your original post neglected to
> accurately portray what you used.

How much information did you expect. I gave the recipe and said it was done on the
rotisserie on my new gas BBQ/


> Had I not questioned you then you'd
> probably never say... probably too embarrasseed to admit you spent good
> money on that crapola... the instructions say to remove the grill
> portion in order to rotisserie... what a dumb concept.

It was a small chicken. I didn't need to remove the grill. I only had to remove the
warming rack.


>
> I still think that contraption is a stupid design.... is why I said I
> hope it didn't cost too much. And still it needs no pan, otherwise
> you've really wasted a lot of money, 'cause you coulda just roasted
> your chicken in a pan in your kitchen oven with the same result.

Who said that I used a drip pan? There is one in the bottom of the BBQ.
I simply copied the recipe as written.

>
> Btw, there is nothing particularly Indian about that recipe... and
> don't go blaming the fact that you found the recipe that way...

But I will blame finding it that way. It is a dandy old BBQ cookbook that I have had for
years. It has sections on various types of outdoor cooking... grilling, spit, roasting
etc. and each style of cooking is broken down into different types of meat and with
several different recipes for each. Some of them are named fo different ethnic groups.
This was on Indian Chicken on a Spit. Deal with it.