"JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
>>> ups.com...
>>> >
>>> > FilterXG wrote:
>>> >> I recently bought a couple pieces of cheap aluminum nonstick cookware
>>> >> (2 fry pans, and 1 saucepan), to replace some stainless nonstick that
>>> >> I've had for a couple of years.
>>> >>
>>> >> What I didn't think of was if these are reactive pieces? I made some
>>> >> fish the other day with a little lemon...tasted fine though I really
>>> >> didn't have much lemon while it was still in the pan. The Teflon
>>> >> coats
>>> >> the aluminum so I'd think it should be nonreactive...but I figure I
>>> >> should ask everybody else's opinions especially since I couldn't find
>>> >> the info on the net.
>>> >
>>> > How could it possibly be reactive when it's covered up? If your
>>> > Teflon
>>> > surface is intact, I fail to see how it could be reactive.
>>> >
>>> > N.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I wonder why Nancy replaced here stainless non-stick cookware. Maybe she
>>> can
>>> explain.
>>
>> What are you talking about? I didn't replace any "stainless non-stick
>> cookware," whatever the heck that is. I've never had any "stainless
>> non-stick cookware."
>>
>> N.
>>
>
> Did you type these words? "to replace some stainless nonstick that I've
> had for a couple of years."
>
> Or, are there two of you?
>
>

Sorry - my mistake. I meant to ask why FilterXG is replacing the cookware.
If it's because the non-stick surface was ruined in two years, it *might* be
that he's not qualified to own non-stick cookware.