0:-> wrote:
> !Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:27:36 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "0:->"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> !Jones wrote:
> >>> I bet I can make you say "who".
> >> How?
> >
> > < Here, hold my beer and watch this! >
> >
> > Well, if I can't, I bet I know who can!
>
> What is his name please?
>
> Or better, tell me his name.
>
> Or better yet, is it you?
>
> If not you, the can we assume it's someone else?
>
> Are you going to make me guess, or are you going to tell me.
>
> Where is this person and what would I call him if I wished to talk to
> him?
>
> If I can't say a word, possibly my owl can do it for me? And you'll
> tell
> me then?
>
> Or in the patter of my kiddies when they first learned to speak, "hoo
> daddy, hoo?'
>
> So, xho IS it? (substitute a 'w' where appropriate.)
>
> Are you having fun yet?
>
> Recognize me yet? Hint: I usually play as dumb as I can manage.

Wow! You're doing a *grand* job.

> And am so talented and experienced at it I make people believe it...

Well, I'd say that you certainly convinced *me*!

> usually by using their ego against them.
>
> Hint: think Fidonet and BBS's.
>
> Been around quite awhile, we have, Jonesy.

Obviously!

> For someone that actually contributes little but disruption you can be
> amusing. Kontinoo pleez, an wil u tel mi hu now?
>
> 0:->

Damn! Outsmarted again! I should have known that this'n was only
*pretending* to be that stupid... he couldn't possibly have been as
silly of a twit as he acted.

I suppose I'd best whack it whih a stick; methinks e's flappin' his
gills at me in a threatenin' manner, so I'd best play it safe.

Jones