Dave W wrote:
> In article >, guy klose >
> wrote:
>
> > "aem" > writes:
> > >[white flag is hoisted from the trench and begins to wave slowly back
> > >and forth]
> > >On due consideration I believe my lexicological pickiness is misplaced,
> > >and that Cincinatti chili is just as valid a name for that dish as
> > >Texas chili is for the other dish. I will continue to believe that
> > >specific recipes with well-established names shouldn't be seriously
> > >altered unless you change the name but that is not the case here. -aem
> >
> > I'm sorry if I was coming across as a jerk, which was not my intention.
> > I have strong feelings about Cincinnati chili, which probably comes
> > across as rather strange to some.
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > Guy
>
> Yeah ... my response to aem was pretty snotty too. Sorry, aem. Please
> accept my apologies.
>
Apologies for what? You guys are weird. I made a snotty, fairly
uninformed, post, you guys posted somewhat more informed snotty
replies. So what else is new? Never apologize. -aem