"Pete C." > wrote in message
...
> laurie wrote:
>> >>
>> laurie
>
> Certainly the mixer. More versatile (with a few attachments) and capable
> than the food processor. The two items aren't even in the same league.
> The mixer is expensive, long lasting and highly functional. A food
> processor is relatively cheap, relatively short lived and often rather
> tedious to use.
>
> I'm not sure I even know what a "nice" food processor is. I've not seen
> anything that an expensive (consumer) food processor can do that a cheap
> one can't do equally well aside from looking good in a set dressed show
> kitchen.
>
> Pete C.

Really? Is there no real difference in quality between the $200 11 cup
Cuisinart new model (can't think of what it's called) and the $79 12 cup
Hamilton Beach model?

--
laurie
mom to Jessica, 5
Christopher, 3