View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.diabetic,alt.support.diabetes
BlueBrooke BlueBrooke is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Recipe and nutrition analysis software

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:19:38 -0500, Janet Wilder >
wrote:

> BlueBrooke wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:05:24 -0500, Janet Wilder
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Pete Romfh wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm curious about that other methods people use for tracking their
>>>> recipes.
>>>> Particularly, what are diabetics doing to determine their recipe's
>>>> nutritional values?
>>>
>>>
>>> I use Master Cook,

>> Hi, Janet --
>> I have Master Cook, as well, and used to use it for all my recipes,
>> but I wasn't sure about the "MasterCook assumes an average 'whole'
>> size of this ingredient" disclaimer for the ingredients that I had
>> entered myself.
>> I'm wondering if I didn't do it right? Do you get this message or
>> know what it means?
>> I quit using Master Cook for this reason and now just enter everything
>> in Fitday to get the nutritional values -- but that has extreme
>> limitations.
>> Thanks,
>> Blue

>
> Hi Blue,
>
> Master Cook's average whole size thing can be bypassed by entering the
> nutritional information yourself and deleting theirs. I will sit at the
> kitchen table with a bunch of jars and enter the into the program
> periodically to keep it up to date with the condiments and sauces we
> like to use. If I'm really concerned over a food, I'll go to the USDA
> files. http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_ma...ecode=12354500


Hi, Janet --

Thanks, but that's my problem. I get this for items that I have entered
myself -- new ones, not even editing the ones they already have. That's
why it throws me -- I've told 'em everything they need to know (yes, my
desk is covered with packages -- LOL!), so the program doesn't need to
"assume" anything.

But the assumption is throwing things off. Oh, well!

Thanks anyway! :-)

Blue