Tesoro wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
>>metabolic functions? I really expected you to post lots of references
>>and documentation of your deep understanding of the subject, nearly.
>>
>>I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily available
>>should take pity on the less informed and just offer the huddled
>>masses the benefit of that superior grasp of it all. You know, to
>>raise them to a higher station.
>>
>>So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit. Don't
>>just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting for more of
>>your keenness. I took a poll while you were in the bathroom - plenty
>>of time...
>
>>Blowhard.
>
> How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to name calling
> for no reason?

Oh, no, Tessie. You got those names (as they say in the commercials)
the old fashioned way, you earned them.

It's all about your blasting in, ignorantly pontificating and
splashing your uninformed opinion around, about subjects you have the
most shallow knowledge about and getting all snide and stupid when
questioned or disputed.

> You can't! Back to reality I guess...

Bwah. The reality of showing your rigid superficiality and rather sad
insistence on your opinion irrespective of any actual information from
substantial sources.

You asked for cites, I gave you cites. You shut up, tucked your tail
between your legs and scurried out of the discussion without so much
as a word of recognition. Real schoolyard bully crap. All big and
tough until somebody shows your crap for the compost it is. Then skulk
away silently.

Wow.

What a classy guy...

Pastorio