Tesoro wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Tesoro wrote:
>>
>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> What happened to your brilliant exposition about human
>>>> nutrition and metabolic functions? I really expected you to
>>>> post lots of references and documentation of your deep
>>>> understanding of the subject, nearly.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily
>>>> available should take pity on the less informed and just
>>>> offer the huddled masses the benefit of that superior grasp
>>>> of it all. You know, to raise them to a higher station.
>>>>
>>>> So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit.
>>>> Don't just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting
>>>> for more of your keenness. I took a poll while you were in
>>>> the bathroom - plenty of time...
>>>
>>>> Blowhard.
>>>
>>> How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to
>>> name calling for no reason?
>>
>> Oh, no, Tessie. You got those names (as they say in the
>> commercials) the old fashioned way, you earned them.
>
>> It's all about your blasting in, ignorantly pontificating and
>> splashing your uninformed opinion around, about subjects you have
>> the most shallow knowledge about and getting all snide and stupid
>> when questioned or disputed.
>
> Show me "blasting in". Show me ignorantly pontificating. Show me
> "snide and stupid". Quote me....

Another sad sack who can't read his own work and see the spirit and
tone. Another holder of The Truth. Here's an easy one. Read your own
words about low carb, then read the contradictory citations from
scientists and scholars and then see your craven silence. Like that.
See how you insist you're right with no supporting information, just
demanding acceptance.

>>> You can't! Back to reality I guess...

<LOL> Good way to hold a conversation. No need to trouble anyone else.
Just ask and answer all the questions yourself. Terrifically
efficient. No need to distract others who might point and laugh. <LOL>

>> Bwah. The reality of showing your rigid superficiality and rather
>> sad insistence on your opinion irrespective of any actual
>> information from substantial sources.
>>
>> You asked for cites, I gave you cites. You shut up, tucked your
>> tail between your legs and scurried out of the discussion without
>> so much as a word of recognition. Real schoolyard bully crap. All
>> big and tough until somebody shows your crap for the compost it
>> is. Then skulk away silently.
>
> Has anyone ever googled Bob(this one)? Another thug!

<LOL> Nice try, oily one. Note the abrupt change of subject. Note no
recognition of his own actions and note no grasp of what would be the
manly thing to do about his failures in biological understanding and
his flawed grasp of metabolism. Note no recognition of the citations
he wanted. Especially note no new data.

> Big and tough in the NG's with no life, very sad. Now that I
> realize who I'm try to communicate it makes it easier to NOT.

Another hilarity. You haven't the remotest idea who you're googling.
More leaping to unfounded conclusions. I'd say that was one of the big
hallmarks of your way of doing things.

>> Wow.
>>
>> What a classy guy...
>
> Thank-you Pastie...
>
>> Pastorio

Zowie, what an uptown wizard you are, Treasure.

So where's all that "information" you were going to provide? That
"medical science" you mentioned. I don't see any, just snotty attempts
to evade and distract. Are you going to put up or will you just
continue to make empty noise?

Pastorio