FoodBanter.com - View Single Post

Kevin S. Wilson

On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:37:55 -0400, wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:16:23 -0400, Tony Cooper
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:23:33 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:27:45 -0400, Tony Cooper
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Start
>>>>him out selling roses at the airport or whatever it is that the
>>>>Kibology neophytes do to earn their robes.
>>>
>>>Selling roses isn't necessary. It's sufficient to goad pompous
>>>know-it-alls into demonstrating their pomposity and know-it-allitude.
>>>Thanks for helping out.
>>
>>I assume that the reason it took you four days to reply is that you
>>wanted to work on your phrasing to sound as pompous as possible when
>>making the accusation of pomposity.
>
>Because it couldn't possibly be that Kevin was away from his computer
>for the entire holiday weekend, could it?

Tony ought to get some new blades for that Occam-brand Razor.

>Tony, can you get any more pompous and unoriginal? Let's see you rise
>to the challenge, kiddo!
>
Oh, he will, I'm sure -- get more pompous and unoriginal, that is. And
he'll do so quickly, now that you've ordered him to.

--
"Danked," the past participle of "dank", is used to refer to someone
who replies to his own post on an online forum posing as another person
(see "Internet sock puppet") but forgetting to change his username . . . .
This was an act of stupidity meriting a name of its own, and because the hapless
contributor's username was Danks, the term "dank" or "danked" emerged.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danked