View Single Post
  #51 (permalink)   Report Post  
JimLane
 
Posts: n/a
Default I AM SO F^&#*)! TIRED OF THE WORDS "LOW CARB"

wrote:
> You can call me a troll or whatever else you want. The website still
> exists right he
>
http://suewidemark.netfirms.com/atkinsgeninfo.htm
>
> It includes lots of links and references.
>
> The Atkins Corporation is a multimillion dollar scam business who is
> profitting from people whose lives are being ruined at the financial
> gain of this malicious company. Also, Subway and TGIF restaurants are
> part of the Atkins Corp.
>
> So, while you whiners complain about someone sending you some "get
> rich quick" spam in your email, you are allowing this corporation to
> continue scamming massive amounts of people, and even allowing them to
> infiltrate every aspect of our lives. Tell me one place where you
> have NOT seen an ad for "atkins" or "carb" lately, other than the
> corner hardware store.
>
> The Atkins Corp. is one of the crookedest companies in the world, and
> it's about time people learn about them.
>
> Go ahead, be brave, go to that website and learn something for once !
> They'll be plenty of time to shoot your mouth off later, (after you
> know what you are talking about).
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2004 18:09:07 -0400, "Tesoro" >
> wrote:
>
>
>>I believe he's a "troll". Friendly response though Jim, about what I'd
>>expect here.
>>
>>"JimLane" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>He is a ng thug, or did that simple fact go racing right past you
>>>without notice?
>>>
>>>jim
>>>
>>>
>>>Tesoro wrote:
>>>
>>>>I can hear the NG thugs rumbling now....
>>>>
>>>>
> wrote in message
m...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 11 May 2004 16:11:42 -0400, "Virginia Tadrzynski"
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Last go round was the diet to end high cholesterol which meant eating
>>>>
>>>>what
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>is now so bad for you and dropping all the things that you can now
>>>>
>>>>devour.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>I saw this posted somewhere and liked the idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>My idea of a perfect NO CARB diet:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No Cheney
>>>>>>No Ashcroft
>>>>>>No Rumsfeld
>>>>>>No Bush
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And definitely omit the Rice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Things to think about before staying on the Atkins diet for very long
>>>>
>>>>>From http://suewidemark.netfirms.com/atkinsgeninfo.htm
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>1. The Atkins plan encourages people to restrict the foods which have
>>>>
>>>snip of newsgroup thug ramblings.

>>

>



Yep, but being as you have bought off on this webpage, did you take a
critical look at it? I'm betting not. Here is some of the mentalmidgetry
that went right past you:

4. Every cardiologist - Note: not a number given or any proof it was
more than one talked to.

5. Where is proof of this warning sent out to physicians? Say so don;t
make it so.

10. One hundred of how many? In Chicago or across the US? Was the survey
conducted randomly? What were the metrics used to select for selection?
Lotsa unanswered questions that COULD mean the respondents belonged to
one camp. Page cannot be found by clicking on your link.

11. Where is the proof of this claim? Not in evidence. I don't think of
milk, cheese, etc., in terms of carbs, haven't looked, but that is where
I get my calcium.

12. Innuendo means you are trying to load the deck and are not
interested in being either fair nor ethical. If you have to resort to
this, you are losing your argument.

13. So what? I know a lot of people on the Atkins diet and not one is
buying their product. This is pure and simple economic jealousy on the
part of people who are not capable of making it in the marketplace.
Equivalent to Gates bashers.

Half the argument presented is wasted bandwidth. Now, about knowing what
you are shooting off your mouth about - all you did was plagerize
someone else's webpage. BTW, who is Sue Widemark? Did you ever examine
who it was that was putting this information up on the web? I'll lay you
odds you have not. She's some Granny who has put up a personal webpage
supporting her philosophy, but presents no credentials of her own.

Her research is sloppy at best. well intended, perhaps, but a bit sloppy.


jim