In article >,
says...
>
>On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:44:49 -0400, Mark Lipton >
>wrote:
>
>>Jon Nadelberg wrote:
>>> Ed Rasimus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've experienced what you describe, although I admit to a naivete
>>>> about Cline's location and the surrounding foliage. I don't mind some
>>>> mint and even a bit of eucalytus might bring out the Koala in me, but
>>>> this was dill.
>>>> Armed with the new knowledge about Cline, I'll look for the
>>>> "Cline-ness" and have Mark to thank for it.
>>>
>>> Hey! I was the one who mentioned it first!
>>
>>Indeed, in this thread at least, Jon. In honor of the announcement of
>>the Chemistry Nobel today, I'll engage in a little shameless self-promotion:
>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.f...21d53dd6d8495f
>>
>>;-)
>>
>>Mark Lipton
>
>So, am I to conclude that "Cline-ness" or "Clineness" is now
>copyrighted or trademarked and must be noted in publication? And will
>that be expanded to Woop-Woopishness?
>
>
>Ed Rasimus

Ed,

I think that a footnote, or two, would suffice, but then I'm not an
intellectual property attorney... ;-}

Hunt