naked on the phone said...

>
> BOB wrote:
>
>> "We feel like the average consumer is going to accept this technology
>> as we move forward," said Barb Glenn of the Biotechnology Industry
>> Organization. "There will not be a label that will indicate this is
>> anything other than healthy meat and milk."
>>
>>
>> http://www.ajc.com/health/content/sh...Medical/Cloned
>> _Food.htmlBOB--Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List
>
> I would rather have a replicated meat, not cloned.
> huge difference.
>
> That's where for example; we scan one steak and build another beside
> it.. it has the same atomic detail as the original.
>
> It would take an un-imaginable amount of computing power to
> successfully scan every detail of a steak
> and really! so far.. Physicists have carried out successful
> teleportation with particles of light over a distance of 600m across
> the River Danube in Austria. The only thing with teleportation (which
> is not replication).. in order to even successfully teleport an
> object, you have to destroy the original.
> this would still only leave one steak.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5btrg
>
>
> We're living in the wrong MM
>
> That's ok! it's beautiful out today! going out to breathe some of it
> in.


I went to the FDA web site directly and couldn't find any such claims
about cloning meat for human consumption.

The ajc didn't even site the news agency that dispersed this mis-
information.

It's BS!!! It's just not going to happen!!!

Andy