werty wrote:
>>> All recipees can substitute citric acid for vinegar with better
>>> flavor .
>
> What "kind" of proof would you like here ? Fool !

The word of someone besides you. Fool.

Evidence that what you write has any validity. From a
third-party source. Just like grownups do it.

>>> Food presevatives are arguementative .

This sentence makes not a whit of sense.

>>> They make food less digestable and can cause illness , cancer and
>>> death in some cases .

So you say. What person who does research in the subject
says the same thing? Name a few.

Salt makes food less digestible. Likewise sugar. <LOL> Fool.

> How can i give you proof thats acceptable to YOU , here !!

Cite some scientific papers. Name a magazine article in a
responsible publication. Offer an online site that has some
serious studies.

> You want ot argue the preservatives DONT harm ??
> The above statement is NOT argueable .

Of course it's arguable. Not all things that preserve foods
are inherently harmful. Salt is a preservative. Sugar and
honey are preservatives. Some herbs and spices have
preservative qualities.

And some chemical preservatives have beneficial effects. BHA
and BHT have been found to be anti-oxidants.

> I am research , and i dont have a Government license
> to do reasearch .... Luddite fool ...

What can that mean? "I am research..."

Who needs a license to do research? What kind of license
would that be? A "You can ask questions and do experiments"
license, I bet.

Do look up what a Luddite actually is. It makes you look
like the moron you are when you write things like this.

>> Please cite references of valid research to support your statements.
>> Just saying that vinegar is "less digestable and can cause illness,
>> cancer and death in some cases" doesn't mean it's true. Thanks.

Like the man says...

References.

Pastorio