Read about it, look it up, stevia is a real plant, Splenda is a chemical.

Don't take our word for it. Check it out.


Fran wrote:
> Why are you assuming that stevia is safe and that Splenda is unsafe?
> On what basis did you reach these conclusions?
>
>
> On Jan 25, 9:22 am, Ozzy <please.answer@NG> wrote:
>> "taopants" > wrote in news:1169731913.366442.189610
>> @m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> I just looked down and saw that karl rec'd stevia as well. So I
>>> unintentionally repeat. avoid splenda-- To me it is just more of the
>>> all too prevalent artifical evil. The Splenda compound is sugar
>>> with a chlorine molecule attached to it. as told to me by a rep when I
>>> was a waiter. Of course I could be wrong/heard it wrong. So research
>>> it yourselvesYou're right. See <http://www.holisticmed.com/splenda/>. Every artificial
>> sweetner is medically worse than sugar, which has its problems too.
>> Splenda is relatively new, and so is assummed to be safe until proven
>> otherwise.
>>
>> Stevia does seem worth checking out.
>>
>> Ozzy
>